Što se iza brda valja?

[komer]

danas trazim po stranim bankama kakvi se krediti nude i nitko ne pise tamo kolika je kamata,jedino da je najbolje doci u poslovnicu i dogovoriti se sa agentom o svemu...*ebo me pas ako su kamate vece od 4% na neke glupe kredite tipa "nenamjenski kredit",a samo manje mogu biti za kupnju kuce,ulaganja u proizvodnju itd...

 

[Nostradurus]

A kak sad, da baš netko zna i hoće, kad ECB kontrolira emisiju novca?
HR više kao država ne postoji, jer nema financijsku neovisnost odnosno monetarni suverenitet.

Pa sad kad to znamo, moramo izaći iz EU!

 

[Nostradurus]

HDZ ima plan, ali i dalje ne poznaju makroekonomiju!

Uravnoteženje deficita? A da zamislimo da je samo jedan čovjek u državi? Kako će on ostvariti štednju? Pa tako da država radi sa deficitom ili da na temelju suficita sa inozemstvom i deviznog pologa nastane novčana emisija za štednju. Prema tome, stvari su jasne. Ali nije jasno kako će se u državi stvoriti 6,25% novca za plaćanje kamata???????????
http://liderpress.hr/biznis-i-polit...-tri-stupa-na-kojima-ce-graditi-gospodarstvo/

 

[Nostradurus]

Ekonomske mantre ne pomažu?

http://www.banka.hr/hrvatska/vujcic-samo-investicije-mogu-potaknuti-bdp

Znači ne nedostaje nam domaćeg novca, nego stranog u rukama ulagača? A od kuda njima novac? Ulagali su i povećali kapital, zar ne. To povlači da će doći ulagati kod nas i htjeti ostvariti profit. A od kuda će doći profit za ulagače? Od novih ulagača, od suficita u platnoj bilanci sa inozemstvom ili od novog zaduženja onih koji ne ostvaruju profit? Sve u svemu, svaki izvor profit traži svog luzera (gubitnika). I onda se čudimo se kako bogaćenje jednih ne stvara bolji život i ostalima. I onda se kao rješenje predlaže strukturne reforme i dolazak ulagača. Kao da će to poništiti vezu između bogaćenja i bankrota na drugoj strani. Najveći domet je ako se gubitak prebaci u neku drugu državu. A to više nema veze sa ekonomijom, nego ekonomski uništenjem koje se samo pokušava kanalizirati na nekoga drugoga.

 

[Nostradurus]

Prava priroda novca

Pogledajte 5 nastavaka o stvarnoj prirodi novca i rješenju:

[YT]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8g-CvvzPx-E[/YT]

Preostali nastavci: http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=The+Money+Fix+(1/5)+(Serbian+subtitle)&sm=3

Rješenje koje se predstavlja u vidu lokalne valute ipak nije rješenje za kompletnu državu. Lokalna valuta izgleda super doka se radi o razmjeni osobnih usluga i proizvoda. Problem nastaje kada se treba uvesti osobni doprinos funkcioniranju države (porez).

 

[Nostradurus]

Čemu socijalni nemiri, ako oni ništa ne rješavaju?

Banalan primjer balansiranog državnog proračuna objašnjava mnogo toga:

>>Zamislimo da imamo državu kao servis, cestara, poljoprivrednika i mlinara. Cestar je u javnoj službi. On godišnje dobiva 99 zlatnika za svoj rad. Od toga plaća hranu poljoprivredniku 66 zlatnika. Poljoprivrednik od primljenih 66 zlatnika plaća mlinara 33 zlatnika, a dio trampom u hrani. A država, da bi opet imala državni proračun 99 zlatnika svakom od njih uzima 33 zlatnika na ime poreza te na kraju opet ima 99 zlatnika za financiranje javne službe.<<

Porez u ovom primjeru je 100% na ostvareni profit!!!

Primjer pokazuje da proračun ili mora raditi sa deficitom ili mora postojati dotok novca izvana. Deficit proračuna je dotok novca iznutra. Krediti su dotok novca iz banaka sa posljedicom stvaranja neotplativog duga. Današnje "uspješne države" se baziraju na dotoku novca izvana koji omogućava otplativost dugova za kreditni novac. Međutim, dotok novca izvana je u biti gospodarska glupost. Devize se mijenjaju u lokalnu valutu i faktički radi emisija. A tu emisiju plaćamo velikim trošenjem resursa. Višak roba je zamijenjen za višak novca??? Zbog čega? Novac je jeftinije odštampati, a ljude koji rade za višak izvoza upregnuti da rade na povećanju domaćeg standarda.

Normalno je da rad svih treba biti plaćen i da bi svi dugoročno trebali pokriti troškove života i da možda nešto uštede. Ako se držimo te definicije preživljavanja, jasno je da treba postojati dotok novca za ostvarenu štednju. Glupo je da to radimo preko suficita u izvozu, a još gluplje je da do njega dolazimo uzimanjem sve većih kredita (što RH radi danas). Prvi način je ekonomska agresija na druge države, a drugi je financijsko samoubojstvo. Dakle, ostaje treći put: Emisija vlastitog novca te balansirana trgovina sa inozemstvom. Sve ostalo u primjeni vodi u nestabilnost, bankrot, velike socijalne razlike, nezaposlenost, slabljenje države (koja jedina štiti stanovnike), itd.

Sve te mjere koje treba sprovesti nisu drage našim razmaženim ljudima i oni bi uzeli sve današnje pogodnosti, ali bez posljedica. Također narod ne zna razmišljati te tako nikakva pobuna protiv vlasti neće ništa promijeniti. Vjerojatnost da se to dogodi je 0,5%. To znači prosječno svakih 200 godina ima šanse da se dogodi i da traje samo godinu dana. I onda opet 200 godina pauze. Crno nam se piše jer narod ima nerealna očekivanja na osnovi čistog neznanja i nekompetentnosti. Zbog toga je pred svakim čovjekom dilema: Ili će se i dalje samozavaravati vlastitim neznanjem ili mora potrošiti dodatno vrijeme da bi proučio i shvatio koji su ključni temelji napretka cijelog društva. Naravno, većina nesvjesno bira ovo prvo. Mozak na pašu. A ako bude loše idemo na prosvjed.
Nema boljeg života jer mi ne želimo loše živjeti. To se može izboriti samo znanjem i borbom da se to znanje primjeni.

 

[Nostradurus]

Monetarna reforma - utjecaj duga na ekonomiju, društvo i okoliš

[YT]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=b0BmynDHjWY[/YT]

 

[Nostradurus]

Nerealne prognoze su slučajne ili imaju neku drugu svrhu?

BDP je uglavnom vezan sa zapošljavanjem! Jer kad nema posla dolazi do otpuštanja radnika. Ako vidimo da nezaposlenost stalno raste, ne znamo od kuda bi BDP skočio? Druga stvar je da BDP dolazi od potrošnje. Ako ljudi gube posao i nema novca za potrošnju BDP neće moći rasti jer bi to značilo da se cirkulacija novca treba ubrzati. A za to nema baš nikakvog povoda. Jedina slamka spasa je porast izvoza. Samo za to treba imati strane kupce sa novcem. A kako je u svijetu još uvijek kriza, nema ni naznake zamaha na tom planu.

Ekonomija je uvijek u ravnoteži! Samo ta ravnoteža može biti na bilo kojem obimu BDP-a. U financijsko neravnoteži su samo subjekti čiji su troškovi u veći od prihoda. Međutim to nije ekonomska neravnoteža. To je ekonomski problem sa velikim posljedicama. A pitanje kako da što manje bude ekonomskih problema u društvu, traži ozbiljniju analizu i rješenje.

http://www.business.hr/komentari/ko...godini-samostalno-uspostaviti-svoju-ravnotezu

 

[Nostradurus]

Ispiranje mozga: Izvozna privreda kao rješenje naših problema?

Izvozna privreda koju se danas često spominje u je biti čista zamjena za zlatni standard. Jer što mi dobivamo suficitom u platnoj bilanci? Samo to da na osnovu pologa deviza izdajemo novac BEZ DUGA. Pitanje zdravog razuma je zašto uključiti toliki broj ljudi da bi stvorili suficit i izdali novac bez duga. To je ekonomski i ekološki promašaj. Tj. u konačnici se želi postići ubacivanje novca bez duga, ali na način koji je poprilično težak i neefikasan!! A da ne govorim da su stranci dobili dio naših proizvoda i usluge faktički za obojeni papir. Devize koje su podloga izdavanja domaćeg novca se ne bi smjele koristiti za ništa drugo jer je to falsificiranje novca.

Izvozna privreda je praktično potrebna samo radi vraćanja stranih kredita. A pitanje uzimanja stranih kredita je na prvom mjestu trebalo biti na načelu isplativosti. Tj. ako su krediti uzeti, moralo se znati na koji način će se vanjskotrgovinskim suficitom i otplatiti. Sve drugo je izdaja nacionalnih interesa.

 

[Nostradurus]

Ispiranje mozga: Rast BDP-a je rješenje

Ovaj mix mjera zbilja nasmijava. Prema ovim receptima, nećemo upotrijebiti sve neoliberalne bedastoće nego samo dio. I to bi trebalo garantirati uspjeh? A da se malo zamislimo? Čovjek je rekao da se može potaknuti rast BDP-a, ali nije rekao da je moguće da će se potaknuti i rast zaduženja. Pri tome je jasno da, ako sve države nekim slučajem porastu u BPD-u, to ne znači da mogu otplatiti dugove za kredite. Kredit je uvijek veći od duga, a roba na tržištu vrijedi samo toliko koliko ima novca - manje. Dakle, logika kaže da netko tu prodaje maglu. Lako dokazujemo da se ne može trgovanjem stvoriti višak novca za kamate dokle god banka radi sa profitom. Provjerite sami da je nemoguće. Uzmite se primjer jedne banke, nekoliko subjekata, a državu možete i izostaviti. Pa da vidim kako će vam model raditi u teoriji. A kada ne radi u teoriji, tada je pitanje zašto mislimo da će raditi u praksi?

Zaključak: Realna proizvodnja ne može vratiti dugove! To je vidljivo iz statistika.

http://liderpress.hr/blogovi/ekonomalije/u-banske-dvore-hitno-poslati-knjigu-danija-rodrika/

 

[Nostradurus]

Sad znate što vas čeka

www.udarno.com/sokantno-oduzimanje-zemlje-grckim-poljoprivrednicima

Grčka vlada po nalogu “trojke” (MMF, Europska Centralna Banka i EU Komisija) uvodi porez na sva poljoprivredna zemljišta, dok poljoprivrednici prosvjeduju ispred grčkog parlamenta.

Stotine poljoprivrednika, uglavnom s Krete, demonstrirali su jučer u centru Atene protiv spornog prijedloga zakona kojim se po prvi put uvodi porez na sva poljoprivredna zemljišta.

Porez na poljoprivredno zemljište do sada su bili dužni plaćati samo veleposjednici, a ne i mali vlasnici. Poljoprivrednici su do sada plaćali porez samo na svoje prihode.

“Ne duplom oporezivanju!“, “Ni jedan euro za polja!“, pisalo je na transparentima na Trgu Sintagma ispred grčkog parlamenta.

Vrijeme je da konačno prozremo igru u koju nas uvlače i odbijemo igrati po njihovim pravilima. Prosvjedi poljoprivrednika u Grčkoj, zbog novog prijedloga zakona o porezu na nekretnine, su samo simptom većeg problema koji se zove “Potpuna kontrola stanovništva”. Tehnike manipulacije koje omogućuju da ljudi prihvate i najapsurdnije i po njih pogubne zakone, najbolje je opisao David Icke. Prema Ickeu tri su temeljne tehnike kojima se porobljava čovječanstvo:

1. Problem-Reakcija-Rješenje (P-R-R)

Ovom tehnikom manipulacije se namjerno stvara problem, u ovom slučaju “deficit proračuna”, koji je uzrokovan zabranom državama da u opticaj puštaju beskamatni novac, te umjesto korištenja beskamatnog novca države posuđuju “novac” od privatnih banaka, koji građani preko poreza i nameta moraju vratiti s kamatama. Nakon stvorenog problema, čeka se reakcija ljudi koje problem pogađa, te se onda nudi rješenje koje je uvijek daljnja centralizacija moći i smanjivanje građanskih prava i sloboda. Grčki primjer nije klasična P-R-R jer se toliko ne traži reakcija ljudi, koliko se stvorenim problemom opravdava nametanje “rješenja”, igrajući na kartu neznanja većine o pravoj prirodi problema.

O tome sve znate jer sam već pisao!

 

[Nostradurus]

Ispiranje mozga: Monetarna politika je odlična

http://www.vecernji.hr/gospodarstvo...-stabilan-tecaj-kune-i-nisku-inflaciju-912643
-----------------------
Guverner HNB-a: "Novca ima dovoljno za sve. Čuvat ćemo stabilan tečaj kune i nisku inflaciju"

A u tekstu kaže: "Nastojat ćemo ekspanzivnom monetarnom politikom osiguravati najpoticajnije moguće uvjete za kreditni rast. Kao što pečenjarnica živi od prodaje ćevapa, tako banke žive od prodaje kredita."

Zar je moguće da guverner HNB-a ne zna da se porcija ćevapa ne naplaćuju sa dugom od dvije porcije ćevapa (ali koje samo ista pečenjara peče)? Možda guverner nije upoznat sa Modernom monetarnom teorijom? A možda nije vidio ni ovaj film: Tajna Oz-a - http://vimeo.com/36639787 . Preporučamo obavezno pogledati film. Po činjenicama iz filma, naš guverner HNB-a neće biti Robin Hood, već Superhik. HNB u biti pomaže bankarima da preuzmu realna bogatstva Hrvatske za obojani papir koji je čak i štampan u inozemstvu.

Odlično predavanje o osnovama MMT-a (na egleskom) pokazati će kakva treba biti monetarna vlast i zašto. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ba8XdDqZ-Jg . Kriza je posljedica pogrešnih zakona u monetarnoj regulaciju. Samo greška je namjerna. U pitanju je pogodovanje bankama na štetu Hrvatske i njenih stanovnika. Ali grešku ne želi ispraviti niti jedna stranka u Saboru? Slučajnost? A teško da ćete naći da bilo koja nova stranka želi to ispraviti. Politika izgleda nije već dugo u službi boljitka. Bez obzira na prisegu koja se daje??

 

[Nostradurus]

Lažna dilema - Desnica ili ljevica

Premda se ovo čini kao čista politika, kritika ljevice i desnice je na čisto ekonomskoj bazi. A o tome skoro uopće nema nikakvih informacija.

http://xreforma.wordpress.com/2014/01/07/lazna-dilema-politicka-desnica-ili-ljevica/

 

[Kontam]

Evo Nostradurus kako je sve počelo... ako ti se da čitati. Danas linić kaže bez brige a nema pojma kako će on zgromiti narod a MMF će likividirati njega. Vrag svoje repove likvidira.

Who Are the G-17
By Michel Chossudovsky, Friday 22 September 2000
“We want to be open colony and open society.” G-17 coordinator VESELIN VUKOTIC interviewed on “The News Hour with Jim Lehrer”, US Public Television, July 14, 1999

Recently there's been a lot of interest in the economists in the Yugoslav group G-17. They wrote the Program adopted by the so-called “democratic” opposition and its Presidential candidate, Vojislav Kostunica.

The G-17 likes to give the impression it is independent and Yugoslav-oriented. In fact it is funded mainly through the Washington-based “Center for International Private Enterprise” (CIPE). CIPE describes itself as “an affiliate of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.” But in fact it is “a core institute” of the National Endowment for Democracy. The National Endowment for Democracy has nothing to do, as far as we can discern, with Democracy. Rather, the Endowment was created in 1983 to solve a problem of Empire.

People knew that the CIA bribed intellectuals and leaders and set up phony front groups to carry out US policy:

“When these covert activities surfaced (as they inevitably did), the fallout was devastating.” ('Washington Post', Sept. 22, 1991)

So Congress created the National Endowment for Democracy. Allen Weinstein, who planned the Endowment, said:

“A lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the CIA.” ('Washington Post', Sept. 21, 1991)

So the National Endowment (a sort of spinoff from the CIA) controls and pays for the Center for International Private Enterprise which in turn funds the G-17. In addition, the leading G-17 economists hold important positions in the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, and have for many years.

If the “democratic” opposition got in power, the G-17 economists would be in charge of the Yugoslav economy. This is not a matter of speculation. The “democratic” opposition program calls for working with the International Monetary Fund and the Fund does not work on a casual basis. It invariably insists that its men (who conveniently happen to be the G-17 economists) run the show. That is not open for negotiation.

Let us take a look at three of the leading G-17 economists. Their record is most disturbing.

One of the writers of this article, Prof. Chossudovsky, studies the effects of the economic “medicine” imposed by the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. The G-17 program contains the same economic measures they forced on Russia, the Ukraine, Bulgaria and Peru, among many others. The results: social and economic devastation. But because of the long-term US/German attack on Yugoslavia, the results in the Yugoslav case would be much worse.

G-17 economists are fond of phrases like “free markets” and “privatization,” but their International Monetary Fund “reforms” wreck countries. First, they force governments to do away with any social protections—subsidized food or rent, free transportation, free medical care. Out the window. Second, they use economic manipulation and new laws to force businesses—public and private—into bankruptcy. Then these businesses are taken over by a small clique of thieves, international banks, rich speculators and foreign companies. They purchase the businesses at rock bottom prices. This is called “Privatization through Liquidation.”

A case in point is Yugoslavia, 1989.

The elder statesman of the G-17 is Professor Veselin Vukotic. Presently he is one of the brains behind Montenegrin secessionism. But in 1989 he was Minister of Privatization under Yugoslav Premier Ante Markovic.

Yugoslavs have bitter memories of 1989-1990. But do they “put a human face” on the nightmare? Perhaps people think the economic disaster that befell Yugoslavia that year was the natural result of “market mechanisms” or the fault of “incompetent government.” It wasn't. There was somebody pulling the strings.

That somebody was Veselin Vukotic.

In 1989-90, Professor Vukotic worked out of governmental offices in Belgrade alongside an army of Western lawyers and consultants to impose the Financial Operations Act. It was a World Bank plan.

Under this law, companies were selected for bankruptcy or liquidation. They were forced to meet impossible conditions. In this way, Vukotic orchestrated the breakup of fifty percent of Yugoslav industry. 50%! World Bank data confirms that under his direction more than 1100 industrial firms were wiped out from January 1989 to September 1990 And that was only the beginning.

Over 614,000 industrial workers were laid off out of 2.7 million. The areas hardest hit were: Serbia, including Kosovo, and Bosnia-Herzegovina and Macedonia. Real wages did a nose-dive. Social programs collapsed. Unemployment shot up.

And now this same Vukotic, a key man in G-17, wants to return to power.

When the IMF gets its jaws on a country it forces the government to work under people like Vukotic. So Vukotic could finish the job he started in 1989 and which ironically was discontinued when economic sanctions were imposed in 1992. (Bulgaria would probably be better off today if it had been hit with sanctions instead of with the International Monetary Fund!)

While hoping to get his hands on all of Yugoslavia once again, Mr. Vukotic is practicing on the cooperative regime in Montenegro. Montenegrin boss Milo Djukanovic, his former student, has appointed Vukotic Deputy Chief of the Privation Commission which is auctioning off state property in Montenegro. Recently we discovered a US Commerce Department advertisement on the internet. The title is: “Montenegro: Seeks Privatization Fund Managers.” The advertisement explains that these Managers are needed in Montenegro, where US officials are “providing technical support” for so-called privatization. The managers would control “funds” that would take over ownership of what is now public property. The Managers could “restructure” these privatized companies—lay off the workers and sell the most valuable components. The Commerce department promises that this “should be quite profitable.” Note how brazenly the U.S. Commerce Department celebrates the transformation of Montenegrin property into foreign profits.

Vukotic is helping in other areas as well. For example, last June NATO marched into Kosovo, and the UCK along with them. Wherever they went, they drove loyal Yugoslav citizens from their homes, stole or destroyed their property and threatened them with death. By June 26, the expulsions were at a peak.

Vukotic could no longer remain silent. According to the Associated Press, on June 26 Vukotic demanded that Kosovo have its own currency, separate from the dinar!

Dr. Dusan Vujovic

One of the most prominent G-17 people is Dr. Dusan Vujovic, a senior economist at the World Bank. He acts as a link between G-17 and Washington. He has been very active overseeing “reforms” in so-called “transition countries”. In August 2000, Vujovic was in charge of negotiating one of the World Bank's most deadly economic packages, imposed on the Ukraine, already devastated by previous International Monetary Fund Measures.

What happened to the Ukraine?

The Ukraine disaster started in the fall of 1994 in Madrid, Spain. Prime Minister Vitali Masol signed an agreement with the International Monetary Fund.

In exchange for accepting “economic shock treatment” Ukraine got a 360 million dollar loan, a very small amount as these things are calculated. Reforms were launched in mid-October, 1994. The IMF ordered the Ukrainian authorities to abandon State controls over the exchange rate. This led to the collapse of the currency. The price of bread increased overnight - 300%. Electricity shot up—600%. Public transportation—900%.

“Dollarised” prices were forced on a population with earnings below ten dollars a month. Credit was frozen. With super high electricity prices and no credit, public and private industry was destroyed. The international speculators moved in like sharks in a frenzy.

Then in November 1994, World Bank negotiators were sent in to “advise” the government on overhauling Ukraine's agriculture. The grain market was deregulated. This opened Ukraine up to the dumping of US grain surpluses. Ukraine went from being a grain exporter to begging for Food Aid from the European Union and the U.S. Thanks to the International Monetary Fund, Ukraine is a starving political protectorate of the US and Germany. And remember, Ukraine never did anything to offend the U.S., unlike Yugoslavia.

 

[Kontam]

G-17 member Dr. Zeliko Bogetic has a senior position at the International Monetary Fund. Bogetic has been doctor in many economic cures. The patient always dies.

In 1994-96, he played a key role in forcing a structural adjustment program (SAP) on Bulgaria. All social defenses—price controls, subsidized food, housing and medical care, were stripped away.

The program led to mass poverty. By 1997, old age pensions (according to World Bank sources) had collapsed to two dollars a month. The World Bank admits that 90 percent of Bulgarians now live below the extreme poverty level but, they say, much economic progress is being made. Apparently perfection will be achieved when there are no Bulgarians left alive.

What would Mr. Bogetic do if he and his G-17 colleagues came to power under a “democratic” opposition government?

Bogetic was dispatched by the International Monetary Fund to Podgorica, Montenegro to advise the pro-secessionist government of President Milo Djukanovic. Bogetic was to set up a currency board modeled on that of Bosnia under the Dayton Accord. Bogetic's advice was to stop using the Dinar, the Yugoslav currency. He said that under no circumstances should Montenegro establish a Central Bank. Now remember, the Djukanovic government in Montenegro says it wants “independence” from Yugoslavia—but a Central Bank is a requirement for real independence. No, said Bogetic, that is the “worst possible solution”. Meaning: independence in the colonial sense.

Bogetic would be the likely candidate for Yugoslav Central Bank Governor if the “democratic” opposition were to win.

What would he do?

The same thing he's been doing in Montenegro—establish a colonial style currency board linked to the Deutschmark. Then monetary policy would be controlled by the country's creditors. This would be an excellent state of affairs for the creditors, but very bad for the common people. It would make it impossible to finance economic reconstruction through the mobilization of Yugoslavia's own domestic resources. The country would be in a straightjacket.

What would International Monetary Fund-Type Reforms mean for Yugoslavia? If the “democratic opposition” came to power they would enforce International Monetary Fund economic medicine. That's what they say in their Program.

But would this be the same medicine that the Fund (including some of the people who lead the G-17) have prescribed for Russia, Bulgaria and Ukraine?

Russia, Bulgaria and Ukraine cooperated fully with Washington. As nations, they never resisted being turned into colonies. Was the West merciful?

Consider Russia. During the first year that the reforms were applied, 1992, wages collapsed by 86 percent. And in many of the countries of the Balkans and Eastern Europe, economic activity has been cut in half, even if it was low before.

And these are cooperative countries. As everyone knows, the U.S. is very annoyed with Yugoslavia. Yugoslavia has not been a good slave. It has not kissed the hand of the bombers.

History shows that if the Monetary Fund gets hold of a country that has been rebellious the treatment is vicious. And we are not talking about major rebels, like Yugoslavia. We are talking about very moderate rebels, like Peru.

In Peru, the government of President Alan Garcia (1985-1990) refused to do some of what the International Monetary Fund ordered it to do. In 1985, it decided to pay international debts at a reduced rate. It instituted an economic program that would help (instead of destroying) the economy.

The country was immediately put on a black list by the International Monetary Fund. This disrupted Peru's foreign trade.

Enter Professor Alberto Fujimori. It was the 1990 elections. With help from Washington, Peru was having economic problems, so many people wanted a change. Fujimori was an unknown. People felt he was “honest” and “promising”. He led a tiny party that had never held power. He seemed to be squeaky clean.

With Washington's help, he was the top runner-up in the 1990 elections. The electorate chose him over the other candidates “because we did not know who he was” and “we thought he was honest” and “maybe if we put in someone Washington likes they will go easy on us.” They did not understand. Washington has no mercy.

Fujimori of course caved in to the International Monetary Fund's demands. What followed was the most deadly economic “reform” in Latin American history. From one day to the next, the price of fuel increased by 31 times (2,968 per cent) and the price of bread increased more than twelve times (1,150 per cent).

People could no longer afford to boil water. A cholera epidemic broke out.

The social consequences were devastating. An agricultural worker in August 1990 was paid $7.50 a month (US). That was enough to buy two hamburgers and a drink at McDonalds. Consumer prices in Lima were higher than New York.

Real earnings dropped by 60 per cent. By mid-1991 the standard of living had declined by 85 per cent.

And this was the just beginning of ten years of deadly reforms under Fujimori.

And remember, Peru didn't really do anything. Just resisted a few International Monetary Fund Measures. But Yugoslavia? Yugoslavia has been driving the German Establishment (and now the Americans) crazy for 100 years or more. Washington and Berlin would like nothing more than to make Yugoslavia an example of total enslavement, to show people what would happen to them if they were to resist.

Haven't the U.S. and Germany made this perfectly clear in Kosovo? A gangster-fascist regime has been installed. And Western leaders are fully aware of the horror they have wrought in Kosovo. UN Secretary General Kofi Annan received a special report about this. The report was discussed by the British newspaper, the Observer:

Murder, torture and extortion: these are the extraordinary charges made against the UN's own Kosovo Protection Corps in a confidential United Nations report written for Secretary-General Kofi Annan.

The KPC stands accused in the document, drawn up on 29 February, of 'criminal activities—killings, ill-treatment/torture, illegal policing, abuse of authority, intimidation, breaches of political neutrality and hate-speech'.

Quoted in “How Will You Plead at your Trial, Mr. Annan?” at http://emperors-clothes.com/news/howwill.htm
What would Washington do if it's G-17 employees got hold of Yugoslavia? They would institute the most extreme economic “reforms” to devastate the country.

Prices would go sky high; farmers would lose their land; businesses would be bought up and closed down. In Hungary they privatized the only light bulb factory and shut it down so that now everybody has to buy bulbs from the US company, General Electric. In Yugoslavia they would take away the lamps. People would be reduced to starvation.

This kind of suffering produces ethnic tension. Washington would whip this up by sending in their UCK (KLA) fascist terrorists. Why does Washington keep the UCK in power in Kosovo? Because they want to use them again. For what? They are incapable of fighting a real army. But they are capable of terrorizing civilians.

A Washington-controlled government would bring in NATO troops to “help keep order.” The troops would never leave. The hunt for imaginary war criminals would go on, a thousand times worse than it is in the Bosnian Serb Republic. Croatians, Bosnian Muslims and ethnic Albanians who fled to Serbia to escape fascist persecution would be put on the list of phony war criminals. All loyal Yugoslavs would have to pay for their (imaginary) crimes so that “healing can begin.”

Every effort would be made to humiliate the people, to break their spirit, and to eliminate potential leaders of resistance.

Do you know what the United States did a few years ago to Vietnam? When the Vietnam War ended, the US government ordered an embargo which did Vietnam a lot of harm, economically. A few years ago, Washington agreed to lift the embargo. In exchange, Vietnam had to agree to pay the debts of the former South Vietnamese government, a puppet government controlled by Washington. Most of its debt came from borrowing money (from the US) to buy weapons (from the US) to kill its own people. And now Vietnam is being forced to pay this “debt” to Washington, after Washington had invaded Vietnam and was driven out, leaving two million Vietnamese dead.

The “democratic” opposition says that if they can just get into power everything will be normal. Washington would treat the Yugoslavs right. Sure they would. Just the way they treated the American Indians.

Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics, University of , Ottawa, author Globalization of Poverty, Third World of The Network, Penang, Zed Books, London, 1997. and Jared Israel , editor, www.tenc.net (Emperor's Clothes)

The Global Reflexion Foundation contributes, according to her ability, to the distribution of information on international issues that in the media does not recieve proper attention or is presented in a distorted way.

www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]


Švabe su švabe i uvijek će biti švabe. Okupiti izdajnike i rezorit sustav iznutra.

 

[Nostradurus]

Stočno brašno - brašno koje može ubije sve u lancu prehrane

To je dokaz da vam ne lažem. Sve što se provodi, radi se krivo.

Inače, naletio sam na ovaj tekst. Ne znam gdje bih ga stavio:

http://nasevijesti.com/index.php/pr...te-reciklirane-leseve-a-da-to-i-ne-znate.html

Jako je zanimljiv jer se spominje korištenje stočnog brašna i teške posljedice za zdravlje. Da li to znate?

 

[Nostradurus]

Ispiranje mozga - mirovinski fondovi potiču zapošljavanje i razvoj

Ovo je jutros izjavio Ministar Linić na hrvatskom radiju. Naš genijalni ministar je to ovako objasnio. Ako mirovinski doprinosi od mio fondova ne završe u kupovini državnih obveznica to potiče zapošljavanje i razvoj. Po ovome ispada da bi država, kada bi primila te novce i ulagala iste u dionice, uradila isto to. Međutim, država to ne smije raditi jer bi to vodilo u državnu intervenciju??? * Kako je novac za mirovine u biti izdvojen iz sustava, njegovo vraćanje ipak ne proizvodi više novca u državi. Taj novac se ne može "oploditi" u više novca, ako nema ubacivanja novog novca u sustav. Tek tada gospodarstvo ima globalnu isplativost i mogućnost oplođivanja.

Sudeći po tome, naši mio fondovi bi trebali ulagati novce samo u poslove koji omogućavaju povećanje dotoka novca iz inozemstva. Međutim, oni to baš i ne rade. Država se zadužuje vani i stvara novac koji donosi globalni profit, ali time stvara dug veći od tog profita (tj za kamate). *To isto tako znači da bi država mogla primati uplate za mio fondove i organizirati ulaganje u izvozne poslove. Međutim, vidi vraga, političari su odlučili da to nije njihov posao. Oni očekuju da gospodarstvenici to sami shvate (ali im oni to otvoreno ne kažu)??? *Ipak, ovdje imamo apsurd. Čak i da sve možemo proizvesti u državi, ne možemo stvoriti višak novaca koji stvara globalni profit u državi. On se može, po sadašnjim regulama, stvoriti samo pretvaranjem suficita platne bilance države u višak novca. To je neka vrsta novog zlatnog standarda. Domaći novac se izdaje na osnovu pologa deviza. HNB je samo mjenjačnica, a globalna profitabilnost poslovanja u Hrvatskoj ovisi o dovoljnom platnom suficitu. Problem je što dovoljan platni suficit ne mogu postići istovremeno sve države jer su svojim platnim bilancama vezane. Jednima suficit, je drugima deficit.

Zaključno, ministar Linić je lagao da ulaganja mio fondova stvaraju radna mjesta i pokreću gospodarstvo. Da je to istina, što je kapital mio fondova veći, to bi trebalo biti više zapošljavanja i razvoja. A to se ne događa. Sve u privredi ovisi o dotoku novog novca! Povrat izdvojenog novca u privredu stvara samo manji gubitak istog, ali ne daje potrebni globalnu profitabilnost gospodarstvu. Novci mio fondova se pretvaraju u dionice - udjele, a udjeli ne mogu stvoriti više novca dok ga nema na tržištu. Dionice imaju vrijednost jedino ako su firme profitabilne. A firme mogu biti globalno profitabilne jedino, ako postoji višak novca koji ulazi u sustav. To znači da je i gospodarstvo i tržište dionica vezano za dotok novog novca. Oskudica vodi u raspad gospodarstva po slučajnoj shemi. I to se već godinama događa. Svi sektori su pogođeni (osim onih sa monopolom). Odabirom samo profitabilnih firmi za ulaganje, mio fond ne rješava problema. Firme koje objektivno ne mogu postići profitabilnost jer nema dovoljne ponude novca propadaju i njihova proizvodnja se često nadomješta uvozom koji naravno povećava gubitak novca i time zahtijeva još veće dizanje stranih kredita. A krediti su neotplativi dok nema dovoljnog suficita u platnoj bilanci države.

Sve je znači povezano. Pogrešna gospodarska i vanjska politika, koju je nemoguće izmjeniti unutar EU nas sve vuče u bankrot države. Takozvane prednosti EU koje se svode na lakše vođenje ekonomskog rata kada imaš organiziranu ekonomiju koja ima instrukcije što treba raditi. A naše vodstvo je krenulo u taj rat sa namjerom da ga izgubi?? *Pitanje je samo, zašto bi kao mala država htjeli voditi ekonomski rat protiv drugih? Prije će biti da su nas uvukli u EU da bi nas lakše ekonomski uništili. A znamo tko se je hvalio da je pomogao našem ulasku u EU - skoro sve političke stranke u saboru. Zaključak izvedite sami.

 

[Kontam]

Re: Ispiranje mozga - mirovinski fondovi potiču zapošljavanje i razvoj

Linić će ionako u Remetinec sad je pitanje koliko težak. Novac u mirovinama bi trebao biti konzervirani novac za buduće isplate, a odštampani novac u istom iznosu treba pokrivati tekuću inflaciju koji će umirovljenici jednom imati. Recimo ako se 20 mld kuna godišnje odvaja sa strane u mirovinski fond, onda se tih isti 20 mld mora odštmpati plus provizije bankarima što nam bajno vode te fondove plus godišnja inflacija. Mirovine ne trebaju biti špekulativni kapital!!! RMF je pokrio gubitke svoje matične banke u NEXE grupi , alo? Gdje to ima? Da mirovina bude dovedena u pitanje zbog savjesnog ili ne savjesnog direktora ili stanja na tržištu??? Nakaradan sustav, nakaradnih vrjednosti! Stoko jedna. Marš

 

[DARIJUS]

meni su i tak odmaknuli penziju...do 67. godine...a po svemu kaj tu pričate, nije ni sigurna...znači opet u se i svoje kljuse...happy):

 

[Nostradurus]

Već su davno skužili da bi mirovinski fondovi imali više da us lovu stavili na ororčenje??

Slažem se sa vama da lova mio fondova ne treba da se ulaže u gospodarstvo. Druga lova se uvijek može odštampati za (društveni) gospodarski rast. Međutim, kada se zatvori ciklus odvajanja i izdavanja, mio fond mi mogao da bude neka vrsta banke za uzajamnu pomoć umirovljenicima. Pogotovo jer bi umirovljenici to mogli otplatiti kada imaju prihode veće od troškova, a što je potrebno da bi se financijski opstalo.